Viewing entries tagged
Maryland crimes

Comment

BIA Affirms Prior Determination that MD Conviction for Sexual Solicitation of a Minor is CIMT

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), on remand from the Fourth Circuit, has determined that a Maryland conviction for sexual solicitation of a minor is a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT) even though the statute does not require the defendant to know the age of the victim. The BIA held that “sexual crimes involving young children have historically been excepted from [the mens rea] requirement because the intent to achieve the immoral result is inherent in the willful commission of such an act.”

Recognizing that this a departure from past CIMT precedent, the BIA will apply it only prospectively in the Fourth Circuit. The BIA declined to determine if retroactive application in other circuits would be appropriate.

The full text of Matter of Jimenez Cedillo can be found here:

https://www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1252591/download

Comment

Comment

Fourth Circuit finds that MD Petty Theft Conviction is not Crime Involving Moral Turpitude

The Fourth Circuit has determined that Maryland's petty theft statute does not match the generic definition of a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT).   Maryland’s theft statute does not distinguish between substantial and de minimis takings as required to qualify as a CIMT under Matter of Diaz-Lizarraga. The Court further concluded that the statute is indivisible, and as such, use of the modified categorical approach was inappropriate.  

The full text of Levya Martinez v. Sessions can be found here:

http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/171301.P.pdf

Comment

Comment

Fourth Circuit Finds that MD Third Degree Burglary is a CIMT

The Fourth Circuit has determined that a Maryland conviction for third degree burglary qualifies as a crime involving moral turpitude.  "The act of breaking and entering a dwelling, with the intent to commit any crime, necessarily involves conduct that violates an individual’s reasonable expectation that her personal living and sleeping space will remain private and secure." 

The full text of Uribe v. Sessions can be found here:

http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Published/161427.P.pdf

Comment

Comment

BIA Rules that Statutory Rape can be a CIMT Even if Statute Requires no Culpable Mental State about the Victim's Age

Pedro Jimenez-Cedillo was convicted of sexual solicitation of a minor in violation of section 3-324 of the Maryland Criminal Law.  Jimenez-Ceillo argued that his state statutes of conviction reach consensual sexual conduct and do not require that a violator possess any culpable mental state regarding the age of the victim. The Department of Homeland Security argued that although the Maryland law lacks these elements, the offense is a categorical crime involving moral turpitude because all violations of the statutes necessarily involve either a very young victim—that is, a child under 14 years of age—or a substantial age difference between an adult perpetrator and a minor victim under the age of 16.  "While we held in Matter of Silva-Trevino that moral turpitude was inherent in a sexual offense against a minor if an alien knew or should have known that the victim was a minor, our decision did not foreclose the possibility that moral turpitude will inhere in some crimes, even if the relevant statute lacks an element that requires the perpetrator to have some culpable mental state regarding the victim’s age."  "We therefore clarify our decision in Matter of Silva-Trevino and now hold that a sexual offense in violation of a statute enacted to protect children is a crime involving moral turpitude where the victim is particularly young—that is, under 14 years of age—or is under 16 and the age differential between the perpetrator and victim is significant, or both, even though the statute requires no culpable mental state as to the age of the child." "[S]ection 3-307(a)(3) of the Maryland Criminal Law, the victim is much younger (no older than 13) and the perpetrator must be at least 4 years older. While sections 3-307(a)(4) and (5) reach relatively older victims (under 16 years of age), these provisions also require that the perpetrator be an adult who is significantly older than the victim—specifically, at least 6 years older. We therefore conclude that all of the conduct proscribed by section 3-307 categorically fits within the generic definition of a crime involving moral turpitude.  Finally, we note that a defendant may be convicted under section 3-324(b) for knowingly soliciting a law enforcement officer who is posing as a minor to engage in sexual activity. We understand such an act to be equivalent to an attempt to engage an actual minor in unlawful sexual activity."

The full text of Matter of Jimenez-Cedillo can be found here:

https://www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/955631/download

Comment