Viewing entries tagged
accessory to a felony

Comment

Fifth Circuit Determines that Louisiana Conviction for Accessory after the Fact is not an Obstruction of Justice Aggravated Felony

The Fifth Circuit has determined that a Louisiana conviction for accessory after the fact is not an obstruction of justice aggravated felony because the state offense is a general intent crime, while the generic definition of obstruction of justice requires a specific intent to interfere with the process of justice.

The full text of Lopez Orellano v. Garland can be found here:

https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/23/23-60248-CV0.pdf

Comment

Comment

Ninth Circuit Finds that CA Accessory after the Fact to a Felony is not Agg Fel

The Ninth Circuit has determined that a California conviction for accessory after the fact to a felony is not categorically an aggravated felony related to obstruction of justice because it encompasses conducted related to crimes which are not the subject of an ongoing investigation or proceeding.

The full text of Valenzuela Gallardo v. Barr can be found here:

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/08/06/18-72593.pdf

Comment

Comment

BIA Revisits Definition of an Obstruction of Justice Aggravated Felony

The Board of Immigration Appeals had determined that an “offense relating to obstruction of justice” under section 101(a)(43)(S) of the Immigration and Nationality Act,, encompasses offenses covered by chapter 73 of the Federal criminal code, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1501–1521 (2012), or any other Federal or State offense that involves (1) an affirmative and intentional attempt (2) that is motivated by a specific intent (3) to interfere either in an investigation or proceeding that is ongoing, pending, or reasonably foreseeable by the defendant, or in another’s punishment resulting from a completed proceeding. Therefore, a conviction for accessory to a felony under section 32 of the California Penal Code that results in a term of imprisonment of at least 1 year is a conviction for an aggravated felony offense relating to obstruction of justice.

The Board specifically noted that an ongoing investigation is not necessary. For example, acts of witness intimidation before an investigation has begun designed to prevent the reporting of a crime, would still qualify under the generic definition of obstruction of justice.

The full text of Matter of Valenzuela Gallardo can be found here:

https://www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1092896/download

Comment