In the context of a criminal sentencing proceeding, the Eighth Circuit determined that the statute governing aggravated assault in Arkansas is overbroad compared to the definition of a violent felony. The Court also determined that the statute is divisible, and determined that subsection (a)(1) - which requires a person to manifest extreme indifference to the value of human life and to purposely engage in conduct that creates a substantial danger of death or serious physical injury to another person - did not match the definition of a violent felony because it only requires the government to prove that a defendant's conduct created a substantial danger of death or serious physical injury, not to actually use violent force against another person. Given the similarity between the definition of a violent felony in the sentencing context and the definition of a crime of violence in the immigration context, this decision likely has implications in the immigration context as well.
The full text of US v. Jordan can be found here: http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/16/02/143444P.pdf