The Fifth Circuit has affirmed the denial of a motion to reopen an in absentia removal order where the Notice to Appear was missing the time and date of the first removal hearing because the petitioner provided a deficient mailing address to immigration authorities. The court distinguished its recent decision in Rodriguez, finding that the petitioner in the instant matter forfeited his right to notice of his removal proceeding by providing a deficient mailing address.
The decision in Spagnol-Bastos v. Garland can be found here:
https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/20/20-60139-CV0.pdf