The Ninth Circuit has remanded a motion to reopen based on changed country conditions because the agency failed to differentiate the heightened risk of harm to evangelical Christians in Indonesia - who proselytize as part of their faith - from the risk of harm to other non-evangelical Christians.
The full text of Nababan v. Garland can be found here:
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2021/11/23/18-72548.pdf