The Ninth Circuit has reaffirmed that a Notice to Appear (NTA) missing the time and location information of the first removal hearing can still vest jurisdiction with the Immigration Court once it is filed with the court. However, in the context of an illegal reentry case, the defective NTA may raise due process violations, especially when there is some doubt as to whether the subsequent hearing notice was actually served on the petitioner.
The full text of United States v. Bastide Hernandez can be found here:
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2021/02/02/19-30006.pdf
The court issued an amended opinion on July 12, 2021, remanding for the District Court to determine if the petitioner had met the requirements articulated in US v. Palomar-Santiago: https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2021/07/12/19-30006.pdf